hmmmmm…does bad behaviour breed bad behaviour?
A nice enough day today, this morning was lovely, kids ate well at lunchtime and off we went to Rachel’s house. Kerry, baby K and EL were there too. As we walked in E pointed straight at Monster and said in a very sneery tone ‘He’s not looking at my hamster’ (which was what everyone was doing – gathered round looking at his birthday pressie hamster). Monster tbh seems pretty oblivious to this (I would say) quite obvious dislike of him. When all kids were out of earshot Rachel and I resumed our usual weekly chat about the kids. Apparantly after they left our house last week E was saying how he didn’t want Monster to come to his birthday party, how Monster didn’t want to come anyway (which in theory could have been said – and frankly I wouldn’t have blamed Monster if he did say it in response to something like ‘you aren’t coming to my party’ ‘i don’t want to come anyway’) and how he doesn’t want Monster to be his friend. All he would say when questioned – and apparantly was desperate to change the subject – was that he didn’t like it when Monster shouted at him. Regular blog readers will recall this is what I have told Monster to do if anyone does something to him he is not comfortable with – he has the right to put his face right in someone elses and shout as loud as he can ‘stop doing that, I don’t like it’, in the case of E the something he is likely to be doing is physical violence. (so hurrah it worked!).
Rachel reading between the lines has decided that E’s problem with Monster is that he feels inferior to him. E is pretty bright and apparantly in the main is well used to being the clever one in any group – amoung school peers, other friends etc, but Monster blows him out of the water. Monster (and I am stepping out of proud parent mode and know his other limitations but believe I am saying this objectively 🙂 ) is very bright, he is very articulate, very able to hold an adult conversation, has excellent thought process and is very lucid and descriptive in what he says. TBH I see this as an occassional handicap in the ‘wrong’ company and this is probably an example of it. What he is suberb in is also his downfall in that I don’t think he always relates too well to other children. Because he does not get much opportunity to be ‘silly’ and ‘schoolboyish’ (in the theorectical rather than literal way) as I don’t tend to tolerate for example ‘Teeny smells of pooh pooh, she is a smelly girl, na na na na na’ type stuff he simply doesn’t really do it, so when it is called for he struggles. Rachel has been watching him quite intently it appears and was able to call up a couple of example conversations where E was apparently left floundering. One was today when he walked in and one of E’s birthday pressies was a set of dinosaurs, one a hatching baby coming out of an egg, one a baby dino, one a fully grown and one a skeleton. Now this just so happens to be a bit of an area of his expertise but he gathered them all up, put them in logical order and proceeded to explain the life cycle to me, he did this not in a showing off way, simply matter of fact cos he has been taught it and he knows it and is used to (and expects) praise from me for repeating stuff like that back to me and demonstrating his knowledge and understanding. Some of his vocabulary on this was beyond the other children and certainly the logic which was apparent to him was lost on them. This is probably casting him in a bad light – he laughs constantly and is in no way being hothoused or pushed academically by me, indeed him and Teeny spend much of their fay chasing each other round the house and giggling like maniacs – he does know how to have fun and has a great sense of humour, but again slightly more targeted towards older company… So back to Rachel’s theory.. E feels threatened by his ability to vocally and mentally ‘outwit’ him so he resorts to the one chink in Monster’s armour which is that Monster will never, ever hit him back.
Now I am actually proud of this. In our house we have a total non acceptance towards violence. The children are not smacked, Ady and I are not violent towards each other, the children do not watch, read or are otherwise exposed to violence, there are no obviously violent toys, of course they are sometimes rough with each other in their squabbles but they also ‘know’ that I do not find it acceptable behaviour. In the past people have told me I am naive in my attitude here and that violence is a part of everyday life, well it isn’t in my life. I have never been hit and never hit anyone else and sincerely hope neither happens in the future. I would not tolerate violence towards me or my family from anyone. I am aware that it exists and when I feel the children are of an appropriate age to comprehend it they will learn about it, and of course Monster gathers sticks from the garden and pretends they are swords and he is Peter Pan and Captain Hook, but he does appreciate it is pretend, not real. Hence the shouting in people’s faces defence mechanism.
So as a theory I guess it makes sense. Rachel told E that her and I are friends and while she doesn’t expect E to have to be friends with Monster he does need to act towards him in an acceptable manner, and aside from the odd minor hiccup once they had settled down today they all played really well, including about an hour after EL has left when E, Monster and Teeny played really nicely together digging in the garden.
However, Monster did a few things I was not happy with and can’t help but blame ‘the company he was keeping’. Very minor stuff, he threw a bit of a tantrum when E started playing with something – small stuff but a bit overdramatic, he did not come and get his shoes on when I asked ( I even counted to three which has never failed before!) and then although it went unseen he pinched me (not hard) when I picked him up and plonked him down to put said shoes on. I could sense huge sighs of relief that he is normal after all from Kerry and Rachel, but did feel a bit let down by him. We had a chat about it at bedtime and he apologised and we left it there
When I watched Wife Swap this week I was both appauled at the behaviour of the ‘naughty teen’ and also a bit concerned at the too goodiness of the other two, and would not want my two to be without a bit of spirit. I am not overly strict and don’t feel I enforce too many rules and regulations but am not sure whether I am relieved he can be a typical nearly 4 year old and disappointed that he seems to have seen another child getting away with behaviour he himself does not like to witness then done a bit of it himself. I think my biggest problem with E is not the way he reacts to Monster, its the lack of respect for Rachel when she tries to modify his behaviour, and that is what I don’t ever want to witness in my two.
Anyway, enough musings, still reinforces so many of the reasons why I know we are doing the right thing HEing them. tomorrow we are spending the morning at Chris and Julie’s and will see where the afternoon takes us!





